Does carbon dating work for 6 billion years


05-Mar-2016 01:11

This article collects evidences that place a lower limit on the age of the Universe beyond the 6,000 to 10,000 years asserted by most Young Earth creationists (YECs) and the literalist Ussher chronology.All of this evidence supports deep time: the idea, considered credible by scientists since the early 1800s, that the Earth (and the Universe) is millions or billions of years old.Lansner's conclusion is that CO2 rises do not cause the temperature rises, but follows them " This information shows that the correlation between CO2 and the earth's warming does not show that CO2 is the driver of the warming, because the increase in CO2 follows the increase in warming.But the question still remains in my mind whether the correlation proves that the warming causes the increase in CO2, as concluded by Lansner.However, the principle of carbon-14 dating applies to other isotopes as well.Potassium-40 is another radioactive element naturally found in your body and has a half-life of 1.3 billion years.The evidence against a recent creation is overwhelming.

By looking at the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 in the sample and comparing it to the ratio in a living organism, it is possible to determine the age of a formerly living thing fairly precisely. So, if you had a fossil that had 10 percent carbon-14 compared to a living sample, then that fossil would be: t = [ ln (0.10) / (-0.693) ] x 5,700 years t = [ (-2.303) / (-0.693) ] x 5,700 years t = [ 3.323 ] x 5,700 years Because the half-life of carbon-14 is 5,700 years, it is only reliable for dating objects up to about 60,000 years old.

This essay has internal links to this essay and to other essays on my website, with external links largely to Wikipedia and scientific papers.

Note to Readers: This essay is more easily navigated with a browser other than Internet Explorer, such as Firefox.

Second, creationists appeal to the Omphalos hypothesis and argue that God deceptively created the world to appear old.

This is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, and is unscientific.

During my second year of college, I had my first existential crisis and a paranormal event changed my studies from science to business.